Back to Blogs
CONTENT
This is some text inside of a div block.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Read about our privacy policy.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Product Updates

AI Safety Alignment Significantly Reduces Inherent LLM Risks

Published on
September 26, 2024
4 min read

Overview

Generative AI Models come with inherent risks like bias, toxicity, and jailbreaking. Organizations are currently employing Guardrails to prevent these risks in Generative AI applications. While Guardrails provide an effective way of risk mitigation, it is equally important to reduce the inherent risk in Large Language Models (LLMs) with Safety Alignment Training.

What is Safety Alignment?

Safety Alignment is a process of training an LLM to “Say No” to certain user queries. This ensures that the model behaves responsibly and ethically during user interactions. The process involves adjusting the model parameters to appropriately handle potentially harmful queries. Safety Alignment, if done right, has the potential to reduce the risk by as much as 70% without compromising the model performance. See a breakdown of the risk reduction for each category below. 

Figure: LLM risk score reduction after Enkrypt AI safety alignment capabilities. 

Introducing Enkrypt AI Safety Alignment Capabilities 

Enkrypt AI provides two solutions for Safety Alignment:

  1. General Safety Alignment: Designed to reduce risks like Bias, Toxicity, and Jailbreaking.

  2. Domain Specific Alignment: For aligning models to industry specific regulations and company guidelines.

General Safety Alignment

Enkrypt AI General Safety Alignment prevents the model from producing toxic or biased content. The dataset also aligns the model to saying no to adversarial prompts. We start with Enkrypt AI Red Teaming to establish a baseline for the risks present in the large language model. Based on the detected risks, a data set is created for Safety Alignment. This process ensures the creation of a high-quality data set that is relevant to the risks of the model. Because our data sets are compact, the performance of the model stays the same while risk is reduced by up to 70%. Refer to video below.

Video 1: General Safety Alignment Demo

Domain Specific Safety Alignment

Domain Specific Safety Alignment makes the Large Language Model compliant to any regulations in your industry. It can also train models to adhere to your company’s internal policies and guidelines. The process is similar to General Safety Alignment. First, a baseline is created using Enkrypt AI’s Domain Specific Red Teaming. This violation data is then used to create an alignment dataset. The Enkrypt AI platform also enables tracking of alignment progress across multiple iterations. See video example below.

Video 2: Domain Specific Safety Alignment Demo

Conclusion

The inherent risks in large language models have posed significant challenges to the widespread adoption of Generative AI. Additionally, a shortage of quality datasets for safety alignment has hindered model providers from effectively aligning models for safety. Enkrypt AI’s Safety Alignment solves these problems and helps organizations make their Generative AI models are both safe and compliant.

Learn More

Contact us today to learn how the Enkrypt AI platform can train your LLM to ensure it behaves responsibly and ethically during user interactions. It can be done in a matter of hours. 

Meet the Writer
Satbir Singh
Latest posts

More articles

Big Ideas

Episode 5 : The Supply Chain of Values: How War, Energy, and Compute Shape AI Risk

AI obligates us to see the whole picture—even the parts we may have little control over in the immediate. Explore how responsible AI demands holistic awareness, ethical foresight, and action in an interconnected world.
Read post
Big Ideas

Episode 4 : Mortality as a Design Principle: Why Only Humans Have Skin in the Game

Explore why mortality makes human ethics real in AI security. CISO Merritt Baer argues for designing AI with fragile human outcomes in mind—reversible workflows, human overrides, and survivable failures. AI has power without stakes; we don't.
Read post
Big Ideas

Episode 3 : Security as Stewardship: The Human Obligations Behind Machine Intelligence

Security leaders bear responsibility for AI's human consequences. When models shape decisions affecting lives, CISOs must evolve from guards to stewards—owning the moral weight machines can't feel.
Read post